Contents Introduction. 6 Évolution de la fintech au Maroc et en Afrique. 6 Les principaux facteurs de croissance. 6 Les d fis du secteur fintech. 7 Perspectives. 7 Évolution de la r glementation de la fintech au Maroc et en Afrique. 7 Conclusion. 7 Introduction. 9 1.1 Contexte de la Fintech. 9 1.2 Objectifs de l'article. 9 Évolution de la Fintech au Maroc. 10 2.1 Croissance de la Fintech. 10 2.2 Acteurs cl s du secteur. 10 2.3 R glementation en vigueur. 11 III. R glementation de la Fintech au Maroc. 11 3.1 Cadres r glementaires. 11 3.2 Initiatives de r gulation. 12 3.3 Impact sur l'industrie. 12 Expansion de la Fintech en Afrique. 12 4.1 R volution Fintech dans divers pays africains. 13 4.2 Solutions de paiement novatrices. 13 4.3 Utilisation des services financiers mobiles. 13 Conclusion. 14 6.1 R capitulatif des points cl s. 14 6.2 Perspectives pour l'avenir. 14 I. Introduction 1.1 Contexte de la Fintech La Fintech est un secteur en pleine volution au Maroc et en Afrique. Bien que le Maroc accuse un certain retard par rapport à d'autres pays africains, le pays commence à innover et à devenir un centre de technologie financière en phase de d marrage[2]. Le Maroc dispose d'un important secteur bancaire qui peut être consacr au d veloppement de ce secteur technologique[2]. En outre, la r glementation marocaine ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des fintech[1][2][3][5]. 1.2 Objectifs de l'article Cet article vise à examiner l' volution de la Fintech et de la r glementation au Maroc et en Afrique. Les sources d'information dans l'article sont les suivantes: - [1] Finances News Hebdo: Cet article souligne que le secteur de la Fintech accuse un net retard par rapport à d'autres pays africains. Il met galement en vidence le potentiel des fintech au Maroc et les d fis à relever pour leur d veloppement. - [2] Industries.ma: Cet article indique que le paysage de la Fintech au Maroc est en pleine volution et que le Maroc commence à devenir un centre de technologie financière en phase de d marrage. Il souligne galement les avantages concurrentiels que les start-up de la Fintech au Maroc peuvent offrir par rapport aux banques traditionnelles. - [3] Laquotidienne.ma: Cet article examine les d fis et les opportunit s li s à l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle dans le secteur de la Fintech au Maroc. Il met galement en vidence la croissance rapide du march de la Fintech au Maroc et les avantages concurrentiels des start-up de la Fintech. - [4] Challenge.ma: Cet article souligne que le Maroc est encore à la traîne en matière de Fintech, mais qu'il dispose d'une r elle opportunit de faire du Maroc un centre de technologie financière. Il met galement en vidence les initiatives lanc es par les autorit s publiques pour promouvoir la Fintech. - [5] PwC Maroc: Cet article examine les Fintech en Afrique et souligne que le Maroc dispose d'un cosystème Fintech encore embryonnaire mais en volution. Il met galement en vidence les avantages non n gligeables dont dispose l'Afrique pour combler l' cart avec les autres r gions du monde. - [6] Finances News Hebdo: Cet article examine la place de la Fintech dans l' cosystème entrepreneurial et des start-up au Maroc. Il met galement en vidence le potentiel des fintech au Maroc et les d fis à relever pour leur d veloppement. En somme, les sources d'information examin es dans cet article soulignent que le Maroc dispose d'un important potentiel pour le d veloppement de la Fintech, mais qu'il doit relever certains d fis pour y parvenir. La r glementation marocaine ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des fintech, mais elle est encore en volution[3][5]. Les start-up de la Fintech peuvent offrir plusieurs avantages concurrentiels par rapport aux banques traditionnelles[2][3]. Les autorit s publiques ont lanc des initiatives pour promouvoir la Fintech[4][6]. Citations: [1] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/fintech-au-maroc-l-ecosysteme-peine-a-decoller [2] https://industries.ma/fintech-le-maroc-simpose/ [3] https://laquotidienne.ma/article/economie/fintech-intelligence-artificielle-technologie [4] https://www.challenge.ma/fintechs-le-maroc-encore-a-la-traine-249734/ [5] https://pwcmaroc.pwc.fr/fr/publications-communique-de-presse/fintechs-en-afrique.html [6] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/economie-numerique-le-potentiel-des-fintech-au-maroc-pas-encore-pleinement-exploite II. Évolution de la Fintech au Maroc 2.1 Croissance de la Fintech Le march de la Fintech au Maroc est en croissance rapide[1][2]. Selon un rapport publi par le cabinet de conseil en strat gie Boston Consulting Group (BCG) en 2019, le Maroc comptait environ 80 start-up de la Fintech en 2018, soit une croissance de 60% par rapport à l'ann e pr c dente[1]. Les domaines de la Fintech les plus actifs au Maroc taient les paiements en ligne, les transferts d'argent et la finance participative[1]. Le Maroc dispose d'un important potentiel de croissance pour la Fintech en raison de sa population jeune et connect e, de l'augmentation de l'accès à Internet et des smartphones, ainsi que de la volont du gouvernement marocain de promouvoir l'innovation technologique dans le secteur financier[1][2][3]. 2.2 Acteurs cl s du secteur Le paysage de la Fintech au Maroc est en pleine volution et le Maroc commence à devenir un centre de technologie financière en phase de d marrage[2][3]. Le Maroc compte environ 80 start-up de la Fintech[1]. Les acteurs cl s du secteur sont les start-up de la Fintech, les banques traditionnelles et les autorit s publiques[2][3]. Les start-up de la Fintech peuvent offrir plusieurs avantages concurrentiels par rapport aux banques traditionnelles, notamment l'innovation[1][2]. Les banques traditionnelles peuvent jouer un rôle important dans le d veloppement de l' cosystème des Fintech en partageant leur expertise, leur savoir-faire, leurs donn es clients ainsi que leurs agr ments avec des start-up porteuses de projets innovants[2]. 2.3 R glementation en vigueur La r glementation marocaine en matière de Fintech est encore en volution[1][2]. Les start-up de la Fintech doivent obtenir des autorisations et des licences de la Banque centrale et de l'Autorit marocaine du march des capitaux (AMMC) pour offrir certains produits et services financiers[1]. Toutefois, la r glementation marocaine ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des Fintech[1][2][3][4]. La r glementation marocaine fait adh rer l'ensemble des utilisateurs à un système de confiance grâce à Bank Al-Maghrib[4]. Toutefois, la place gagnerait à formaliser un cadre règlementaire pour l'open banking[2]. En somme, le march de la Fintech au Maroc est en croissance rapide et le pays commence à devenir un centre de technologie financière en phase de d marrage[1][2][3]. Les acteurs cl s du secteur sont les start-up de la Fintech, les banques traditionnelles et les autorit s publiques[2][3]. La r glementation marocaine en matière de Fintech est encore en volution, mais elle ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des Fintech[1][2][3][4]. Les start-up de la Fintech peuvent offrir plusieurs avantages concurrentiels par rapport aux banques traditionnelles[1][2]. Citations: [1] https://laquotidienne.ma/article/economie/fintech-intelligence-artificielle-technologie [2] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/fintech-au-maroc-l-ecosysteme-peine-a-decoller [3] https://industries.ma/fintech-le-maroc-simpose/ [4] https://pwcmaroc.pwc.fr/fr/publications-communique-de-presse/fintechs-en-afrique.html [5] https://www.challenge.ma/fintechs-le-maroc-encore-a-la-traine-249734/ [6] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/economie-numerique-le-potentiel-des-fintech-au-maroc-pas-encore-pleinement-exploite III. R glementation de la Fintech au Maroc 3.1 Cadres r glementaires La r glementation marocaine en matière de fintech est encore en volution[1][2][3][4][5]. Les start-up de la fintech doivent obtenir des autorisations et des licences de la Banque centrale et de l'Autorit marocaine du march des capitaux (AMMC) pour offrir certains produits et services financiers[1][3]. Toutefois, la l gislation marocaine n'interdit ni n'entrave la cr ation de soci t s de technologie financière, car il n'existe pas de r glementation sp cifique à l'heure actuelle[2][4][5]. La r glementation marocaine ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des fintech[1][2][3][4][5]. Toutefois, la place gagnerait à formaliser un cadre règlementaire pour l'open banking[2][3]. 3.2 Initiatives de r gulation Les autorit s publiques ont lanc des initiatives pour promouvoir la fintech au Maroc[1][4][5]. La Banque centrale du Maroc encourage le système financier bien structur du pays à investir dans l'adoption du num rique[2]. En 2018, la Banque Populaire a lanc la première dition du programme Fintech Challenge et Open Innovation pour montrer les opportunit s dans ce secteur à niveau continental, notamment pour les start-up africaines par le biais de partenariats et de financements[4]. Toutefois, le d veloppement de la fintech au Maroc n cessite une r vision de fond de la licence bancaire et des tablissements de cr dits[1][5]. 3.3 Impact sur l'industrie La r glementation marocaine en matière de fintech a un impact sur l'industrie[1][3]. La r glementation complexe et incertaine peut rendre difficile pour les start-up de naviguer dans cet environnement[1][3]. Toutefois, la r glementation marocaine ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des fintech[1][2][3][4][5]. Les start-up de la fintech peuvent offrir plusieurs avantages concurrentiels par rapport aux banques traditionnelles[1][2][3]. Le d veloppement de l' cosystème des fintech au Maroc demeure tributaire de la volont des banques à partager leur expertise, leur savoir-faire, leurs donn es clients ainsi que leurs agr ments avec des start-up porteuses de projets innovants[2]. En somme, la r glementation de la fintech au Maroc est encore en volution, mais elle ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des fintech[1][2][3][4][5]. Citations: [1] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/fintech-au-maroc-l-ecosysteme-peine-a-decoller [2] https://www.lopinion.ma/Economie-numerique-La-reglementation-de-la-fintech-demeure-limitee-au-Maroc_a31202.html [3] https://laquotidienne.ma/article/economie/fintech-intelligence-artificielle-technologie [4] https://industries.ma/fintech-le-maroc-simpose/ [5] https://fnh.ma/article/actualite-financiere-maroc/economie-numerique-le-potentiel-des-fintech-au-maroc-pas-encore-pleinement-exploite [6] https://www.challenge.ma/fintechs-le-maroc-encore-a-la-traine-249734/ IV. Expansion de la Fintech en Afrique 4.1 R volution Fintech dans divers pays africains La Fintech est en pleine expansion en Afrique, avec une croissance rapide dans de nombreux pays[2][3][4][5]. Selon un rapport de McKinsey, les revenus cumul s des soci t s de Fintech en Afrique pourraient être multipli s par huit d'ici à 2025, pour atteindre 30 milliards de dollars[2]. Les pays africains les plus actifs dans le domaine de la Fintech sont le Nigeria, l'Afrique du Sud, le Kenya, le Ghana et l'Egypte[2][3][4]. Les Fintech africaines ont de beaux jours devant elles, car elles offrent des solutions innovantes pour r pondre aux besoins financiers des populations africaines[2][3][4][5]. Les investissements dans la Fintech en Afrique ont augment de manière significative ces dernières ann es, passant de 400 millions de dollars en 2017 à plus de 2 milliards de dollars en 2021[5]. 4.2 Solutions de paiement novatrices Les Fintech africaines ont d velopp des solutions de paiement novatrices pour r pondre aux besoins des populations africaines[2][3][4][5]. Les solutions de paiement mobile, telles que M-Pesa au Kenya, ont r volutionn le secteur des paiements en Afrique[2][3][4][5]. Les Fintech africaines ont galement d velopp des solutions de paiement en ligne, des portefeuilles lectroniques et des plateformes de transfert d'argent[2][3][4][5]. Ces solutions ont permis de r duire les coûts de transaction et d'am liorer l'inclusion financière en Afrique[2][3][4][5]. 4.3 Utilisation des services financiers mobiles Les services financiers mobiles sont de plus en plus utilis s en Afrique[2][3][4][5]. Les Fintech africaines ont d velopp des solutions de paiement mobile pour r pondre aux besoins des populations africaines, qui ont souvent un accès limit aux services bancaires traditionnels[2][3][4][5]. Les services financiers mobiles permettent aux utilisateurs de transf rer de l'argent, de payer des factures et d'effectuer des transactions financières à partir de leur t l phone portable[2][3][4][5]. Les services financiers mobiles ont permis d'am liorer l'inclusion financière en Afrique, en permettant à des millions de personnes d'acc der à des services financiers de base[2][3][4][5]. En somme, la Fintech est en pleine expansion en Afrique, avec une croissance rapide dans de nombreux pays[2][3][4][5]. Les Fintech africaines ont d velopp des solutions de paiement novatrices pour r pondre aux besoins des populations africaines, en utilisant notamment les services financiers mobiles[2][3][4][5]. Les investissements dans la Fintech en Afrique ont augment de manière significative ces dernières ann es, passant de 400 millions de dollars en 2017 à plus de 2 milliards de dollars en 2021[5]. Citations: [1] https://www.africafintechnetwork.com [2] https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2023/05/03/en-afrique-le-decollage-des-fintech_6171865_3234.html [3] https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/financial%20services/our%20insights/fintech%20in%20africa%20the%20end%20of%20the%20beginning/fintech-in-africa-the-end-of-the-beginning.pdf [4] https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/fintech-in-africa-the-end-of-the-beginning [5] https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/august-2022/fintech-other-knowledge-intensive-services-could-drive-africa%E2%80%99s-prosperity [6] https://industries.ma/fintech-le-maroc-simpose/ VI. Conclusion 6.1 R capitulatif des points cl s La Fintech est en pleine volution au Maroc et en Afrique, avec une croissance rapide dans de nombreux pays[1][2][3][4][5]. Le Maroc commence à devenir un centre de technologie financière en phase de d marrage, avec environ 80 start-up de la Fintech en 2018[1][2]. Les acteurs cl s du secteur sont les start-up de la Fintech, les banques traditionnelles et les autorit s publiques[1][2][3][5]. La r glementation marocaine en matière de Fintech est encore en volution, mais elle ne pose pas de freins particuliers au d veloppement des Fintech[1][2][3][4][5]. Les besoins en matière de r gulation de la Fintech en Afrique sont nombreux, notamment en matière d'harmonisation des r glementations nationales et de protection des consommateurs[1][2][5]. 6.2 Perspectives pour l'avenir L'avenir de la Fintech au Maroc et en Afrique est prometteur, avec un fort potentiel de croissance[1][2][3][4][5]. Les Fintech africaines ont d velopp des solutions de paiement novatrices pour r pondre aux besoins des populations africaines, en utilisant notamment les services financiers mobiles[2][3][4][5]. Les investissements dans la Fintech en Afrique ont augment de manière significative ces dernières ann es, passant de 400 millions de dollars en 2017 à plus de 2 milliards de dollars en 2021[5]. Toutefois, les d fis r glementaires en Afrique sont nombreux, notamment en raison de la diversit des r glementations nationales et de l'absence de r glementation sp cifique à la Fintech[5]. Les autorit s publiques doivent mettre en place des r glementations claires et coh rentes pour encourager le d veloppement de la Fintech[1][2][5]. Les r glementations doivent être adapt es aux besoins des start-up de la Fintech et favoriser l'innovation[2][5]. Les r glementations doivent galement prot ger les consommateurs et garantir la stabilit financière[2][5]. En somme, la Fintech est un secteur en pleine volution au Maroc et en Afrique, avec un fort potentiel de croissance et des d fis r glementaires à relever[1][2][3][4][5]. Les autorit s publiques doivent travailler en troite collaboration avec les start-up de la Fintech pour comprendre les d fis auxquels elles sont confront es et laborer des r glementations adapt es[2][5]. L'avenir de la Fintech en Afrique est prometteur, avec des solutions novatrices pour r pondre aux besoins des populations africaines et des investissements en hausse[2][3][4][5]. Citations: [1] https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writing-resources/writing/essay-conclusions [2] https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/conclusions/ [3] https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-a-conclusion/ [4] https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/argument_papers/conclusions.html [5] https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/how-to-write-a-conclusion [6] https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-a-conclusion

by Youness El Kandoussi | 6 months ago | 0 Comment(s) | 228 Share(s) | Tags :


Contents 1 Abstract.. 4 2 Introduction.. 4 3 Objective: 5 4 Plan of the paper: 5 5 Chapter 1: Risk History and definitions. 5 5.1 Introduction: 5 5.2 Section I: Risk Management History: 6 5.3 Section 2: Definitions of Risk Management: 7 5.3.1 Market Risk: 8 5.3.2 Credit Risk. 8 5.3.3 Liquidity Risk: 8 5.3.4 Operational Risk: 9 6 Chapter 2: Evolvement of Risk Management: Basel I, II and III. 10 6.1 Introduction: 10 6.2 Section I: Basel I and its shortcomings: 11 6.3 Section 2: Basel II 12 6.4 Section 3: Basel III 13 6.4.1 Summary OF changes. 13 7 Chapter 3: Risk in Islamic Finance Institutions. 14 7.1 Introduction: 14 7.2 Section 1: Islamic Finance Institutions are unique. 16 7.3 Section 2: Types of Risks in the IFIs: 17 8 Chapter 4: Islamic Finance Products, Risks and the key challenges. 19 8.1 Introduction: 19 8.2 Section 1: Risks in Islamic Finance Products: 19 8.2.1 Risks in Musharakah Contracts: 21 8.2.2 Risks in Mudarabah contract: 22 8.2.3 Risks in Murabahah Contract: 24 8.2.4 Risks in Salam Contract: 24 8.2.5 Risks in Istisnaa Contract 25 8.2.6 Risks in Iajrah Contract: 26 8.3 Section 2: Challenges of Risk Management in Islamic Finance Products. 27 9 Chapter 5: Operational Risk in Islamic Finance Institutions. 28 9.1 Introduction: 28 9.2 Section 1: Operational Risk in Musharakah contract: 28 9.3 Section 2: Operational Risk in Mudarabah contract. 29 9.4 Section 3: Operational Risk in Murabahah contract. 29 9.5 Operational Risk in Salam contract. 30 9.6 Operational Risk in Istisnaa contract: 30 9.7 Operational Risk in Ijarah contract: 30 10 Conclusion.. 30 10.1 Findings. 30 10.2 Recommendations. 31 11 References. 33 1 Abstract As IFIs are growing extensively and expected to grow up to 15% in the coming years, it is primordial that all the industry stakeholders start to invest their efforts to develop the Risk Management disciplines. The IFSB and AAOIFI are not sparing any effort to guide and participate in shaping the IF Risk Management, however, they tend to be inspired by the existing frameworks historically developed for Conventional Banks. Islamic Finance contracts are very different in nature and in substance from conventional banks, thus, the conventional Risk Management cannot cater for their uniqueness. This paper tried to highlight uniqueness of risk aspects within the IF contracts, and focused on Operational Risk, which is in my opinion in the major risk for IFI. 2 Introduction Risk Management have evolved since its first appearance after the World War II. The Bank of International Settlement have tried to adapt to the changes in the Finance industry and issued 3 version of the Basel Guidelines on Capital Requirements (Basel I, II and III). These guidelines have identified Capital Requirements for Credit Risk, Market Risk and Operational Risk. They also issued Sound Practices for Risk Management for each type of Risk. With the venue of the Islamic Finance Industry in the 1960s, Risk Management tools had to adapt to the uniqueness of their products. IFSB and AOIIFI have invested huge efforts in developing Risk Management guidelines for IFIs. Scholars and Islamic Finance practitioners issued multitude of papers attempting to circle aspects of Risk in the Islamic Finance Contracts. They have demonstrated that Islamic Finance encompasses other types of Risk that are unknown to conventional Banks (Fiduciary Risk, Sharia non-compliance Risk, Commercial Displaced Risk, etc.) Many of those scholars have also found out that the IFIs are more exposed to Operational Risk than the conventional banks, mainly due to the complexity of the contracts and their execution. This research is an attempt to add some more light on Risks faced by Islamic Finance Institution with a special focus on Operational Risk. 3 Objective: Risk Management in IFIs tends to be complex and least understood by the business and even by the Risk Management practitioners, in this research I will attempt to define Risks in IFIs and clarify its specifications by demonstrating its uniqueness, especially in the Islamic Finance contracts, where each contract can encompass more than one type of Risk. I will also try to cover some more details of Operational Risk aspects in the IF contracts and demonstrate its importance and complexity during the lifecycle. That being discussed I will propose some actions that can enhance the Operational Risk Management within the IFIs. 4 Plan of the paper: In this paper, I will be defining Risk Management in general in Financial Institutions and its degree of evolvement especially in conventional banking, how Risk is different in Islamic Financial Institutions from conventional banks, their instruments and what are the key challenges. Then I will be discussing the Operational Risk Management in Islamic Finance Institutions and its specifications. 5 Chapter 1: Risk History and definitions 5.1 Introduction: Risk Management emerged after the World War II, and began to be studied in universities as a discipline with the two academic books ( Mehr and Hedges (1963) and Williams and Hems (1964)[1]. Risk Management was, for a long time, the ultimate tool for Insurance Industry aiming to mitigate Risks related to individuals and companies from losses incurred from accidents[2] After 1950s, and due to the increasing costs of insurance, various Risk Management activities were introduced to the business (e.g. business continuity, self-insurance). Derivatives were introduced after 1970s to mitigate the faced risks. Market, Credit, and Operational Risk Management tools were introduced to manage the emerging risks from the intensified activities with insurance and Finance industries (consequently after 1980s for Market and Credit and 1990s for Operational Risk)[3] The objective of a financial institution (or for any kind of business) is to maximize shareholders’ profits by adding value and best usage of available resources. Financial institutions, in particular, have to manage Risks to achieve the aforesaid objective. Risk is defined as a possible adverse, one or more, outcomes, it is unknown for its intrinsic volatility and unpredictability. Financial institutions face different types of Risks. Business Risks, which “arises from the nature of a firm’s business. It relates to factors affecting the product market. Financial risk arises from possible losses in financial markets due to movements in financial variables [4]”. Oldfield and Santomero classifies Risk in three types: risks that can be eliminated, those that can be transferred to others, and the risks that can be managed by the institution. [5]” Besides the above given definitions, Risk can also be defined as Financial Risk, i.e. Credit Risk and Market Risk, and non-Financial Risk, i.e., among others, Operational Risk, Legal Risk, Reputational Risk and Strategic Risk.[6] 5.2 Section I: Risk Management History: Risk Management historically was the main objective of the insurance industry. After the World War II, large companies started to mitigate their risks by introducing Self-Insurance techniques. It was largely applied to cover adverse financial impacts consequent of events of losses or Market volatility. After 1970s, Financial Risk Management emerges as a cornerstone for multitude of companies including banks. In Fact, Stock Market prices, exchange rates, commodity prices, were their main concerns. Table 1: Milestones in the History of Risk Management[7] In 1990s Risk Management took more momentum and became a high priority matter for corporates, Board of Director have now the responsibility of oversight and monitoring policies effected by the Board Audit and Risk Management Committees. Financial Institution, after 2000s are required to implement capital reserves for risks, especially after the major defaults and the Enron bankruptcy case. Basel II (2004) issued guidelines on more robust capital requirements on banks for Credit Risk, also introduced rules on managing Operational Risk. In 2010 Basel III came as a response to the 2008 subprime crisis, with more constraints on capital requirements and new Liquidity Risk Management guidelines. 5.3 Section 2: Definitions of Risk Management: According to Wikipedia, “Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO 31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events[8] or to maximize the realization of opportunities. Risk management’s objective is to assure uncertainty does not deflect the endeavor from the business goals.[9]” Financial Institutions face generally two types of Risk, Financial and Non-Financial[10] (Gleason 2000). Financial Risks are those due Market volatility (Market Risk), and those due customers’ defaults (Credit Risk). Non-Financial Risk includes, but not limited to, Operational Risk, Legal Risk, Reputational Risk, Regulatory Compliance Risk. 5.3.1 Market Risk: Market Risk is defined as the risk from adverse volatility of traded instruments and assets in a well-defined Market[11]. Market Risk can affect both banking and trading books. In the sense that it is originated from equity price risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, and commodity price risk. Market Risk is said systematic when it arises due to the general volatility of prices and overall changes in policies in the economy. When the price of a specific asset or instruments changes due to events inherent to it, it is categorized as unsystematic Risk. 5.3.2 Credit Risk “Credit risk is most simply defined as the potential that a bank borrower or counterparty will fail to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. The goal of credit risk management is to maximize a bank's risk-adjusted rate of return by maintaining credit risk exposure within acceptable parameters. Banks need to manage the credit risk inherent in the entire portfolio as well as the risk in individual credits or transactions. Banks should also consider the relationships between credit risk and other risks. The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of a comprehensive approach to risk management and essential to the long-term success of any banking organization.”[12] Credit Risk is the risk that counterparty will fail to meet its obligations timely and fully in accordance with the agreed terms[13]. 5.3.3 Liquidity Risk: The Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision[14] (BCBS 2008) defines Liquidity as “the ability of a bank to fund increases in assets and meet obligations as they come due, without incurring unacceptable losses.” Liquidity Risk arises then from adverse circumstances that hurdles a bank to normally operate and meet its liabilities when due. Funding Liquidity Risk occurs when banks are unable to secure funds at a reasonable cost from borrowing, Asset Liquidity Risk arises when banks face difficulties to generate liquidity from sale of assets.[15] 5.3.4 Operational Risk: The BCBS Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk defines Operational Risk as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. This definition includes legal risk, but excludes strategic and reputational risk.[16] Operational Risk was for a long time out of the radar of the corporates and scholars, it was not quite understood. Power writes: “Operational risk was conceived as a composite term for a wide variety of organizational and behavioural risk issues which were traditionally excluded from formal definitions of market and credit risk. The explosion of operational risk discourse gave new structure and rationality to what had traditionally been regarded as a risk management residual and negatively described as non-financial risk.”[17] The Bank of international Settlements (BIS) have categorized Operational Risk into four causal categories[18]: · Process · Business Process (lack of proper due diligence, inadequate/problematic account reconciliation, etc.) · Business Risks (merger risk, new product risk, etc.) · Errors and Omissions (inadequate/problematic security, inadequate/problematic quality control, etc.) · Specific Liabilities (employee benefits, employer, directors and officers, etc.) · People · Employee Errors (general transaction errors, incorrect routing of transaction, etc.) · Human Resource Issues (employee unavailability, hiring/firing, etc.) · Personal Injury – Physical Injury (bodily injury, health and safety, etc.) Personal Injury – Non–Physical Injury (libel/defamation/slander, discrimination/harassment, etc.) · Wrongful Acts (fraud, trading misdeeds, etc.) · Information Technology · General Technology Problems (operational error – technology related, unauthorized use/misuse of technology, etc.) · Hardware (equipment failure, inadequate/unavailable hardware, etc.) · Security (hacking, firewall failure, external disruption, etc.) · Software (computer virus, programming bug, etc.) · Systems (system failures, system maintenance, etc.) · Telecommunications (telephone, fax, etc.) · External Events · Disasters (natural disasters, non–natural disasters, etc.) · External Misdeeds (external fraud, external money laundering, etc.) · Litigation/Regulation (capital control, regulatory change, legal change, etc.) · Relationships · Legal/Contractual (securities law violations, legal liabilities, etc.) · Negligence (gross negligence, general negligence, etc.) · Sales Discrimination (lending discrimination, client Discrimination, etc.) · Sales Related Issues (churning, sales misrepresentation, high pressure sales tactics, etc.) · Specific Omissions (failure to pay proper fees, failure to file proper report, etc.) Gene Alvares attempted a mapping exercise between the Causal Categories and Basel Risk Types (Alvares, Global Association of Risk Professionals GARP studies. 2002). Mapping illustration between the Basel Committee’s proposed operational risk event classification scheme and Zurich IC2 format. (Alvarez, 2002)[19] References Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013 Harrington and Neihaus, 2013, Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013 Jorion and Khoury 1996, reference cited by Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute Oldfield and Santomero (1997), reference cited by Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, , Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute Hubbard, Douglas (2009). The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It. John Wiley & Sons. (Wikipedia) Antunes, Ricardo; Gonzalez, Vicente (3 March 2015). "A Production Model for Construction: A Theoretical Framework". Buildings. 5 (1): 209–228. doi:10.3390/buildings5010209. (Wikipedia) BCBS - Principles for the Management of Credit Risk - final document, September 2000 BCBS - Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision - final document, September 2008 BCBS Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk, 2011 Power p. 103 Cited by Johannes Gaus aus Böblingen, The Risks of Financial Risk Management, Master-Thesis, Economics of Financial Institutions European Business School, Department Corporate Management & Economics, Zeppelin University Marinoiu Ana Maria, Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Operational Risk In International Business: Taxonomy And Assessment Methods, Federal Reserve Bulletin, September 2003, Capital Standards for Banks: The Evolving Basel Accord BCBS, Basel II: The New Basel Capital Accord - third consultative paper April 2003 and Revised international capital framework, June 2006 Basel III: international regulatory framework for banks Sean Kenny, To What Extent were the Limitations of the Previous Basel Accords (I & II) overlooked by Basel III?, Master programme in Economic History, Lund University, School of Economics and Management, June 2011 BCBS- Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process), the New Basel Capital Accord, Principal 2 Basel II, Tamer Bakiciol Nicolas Cojocaru-Durand DongxuLu, December 2008 BIS, BCSB, Basel III: international regulatory framework for banks Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III: International Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards and Monitoring, Dec 10, Bank for International Settlements. http://wwww.basel-ii-risk.com/basel-iii-guide-to-the-changes/ Ahmad Alharbi, Development of the Islamic Banking System, Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance June 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1 Syed Ehsan Ullah Agha, RISK MANAGEMENT IN ISLAMIC FINANCE: AN ANALYSIS FROM OBJECTIVES OF SHARI’AH PERSPECTIVE, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 7, Issue 3 (Aug.) 2015 Specifics of Risk Management in Islamic Finance and Banking, with Emphasis on Bosnia and Herzegovina, E.Kozarević, M.Baraković Nurikić & N.Nuhanović, Bahar/Spring 2014, Volume 4, Issue 1, Çankırı Karatekin University, Journal of The Faculty of Economics, and Administrative Sciences. Ioannis Akkizidis and Sunil Kumar Khandelwal, Financial Risk Management for Islamic Banking and Finance, Palgrave Macmillan. Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (COMCEC), Risk Management in Islamic Financial Instruments, COMCEC Coordination Office, September 2014. ISLAMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES BOARD, GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF RISK MANAGEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONS (OTHER THAN INSURANCE INSTITUTIONS) OFFERING ONLY ISLAMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES, December 2005. Nurhafiza Abdul Kader Malim PhD, Islamic Banking and Risk Management: Issues and Challenges, Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Oct.- Dec. 2015. Hennie van Greuning Zamir Iqbal, Risk Analysis for Islamic Banks, THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C., December 2008. Ahmad Mohamed Rahim, Operational Risks in Islamic Profit Sharing Contracts and Ways to Overcome Them, MSc in Islamic Finance, The Global University of Islamic Finance, October 2014 (http://www.inceif.org/research-bulletin/operational-risks-islamic-profit-sharing-contracts-ways-overcome/) [1] Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013, p. 1 [2] Harrington and Neihaus, 2013, Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013, p. 1 [3] Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013, p. 1 [4] Jorion and Khoury 1996, p. 2, reference cited by Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001,p. 26, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [5] Oldfield and Santomero (1997), reference cited by Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001,p. 27, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [6] Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis Of Issues In Islamic Financial Industry, 2001,p. 28, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [7] Georges Dionne, Risk Management: History and Critique, March 2013, p. 6 [8] Hubbard, Douglas (2009). The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It. John Wiley & Sons. p. 46. (Wikipedia) [9] Antunes, Ricardo; Gonzalez, Vicente (3 March 2015). "A Production Model for Construction: A Theoretical Framework". Buildings. 5 (1): 209–228. doi:10.3390/buildings5010209. (Wikipedia) [10] Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis of Issues in Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, p. 28, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [11] Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis of Issues in Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, p. 28, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [12] BCBS - Principles for the Management of Credit Risk - final document, September 2000 [13] Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis of Issues in Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, p. 29, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [14] BCBS - Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision - final document, September 2008 [15] Tariqullah Khan Habib Ahmed: Risk Management: An Analysis of Issues in Islamic Financial Industry, 2001, p. 29, Islamic Development Bank, Islamic Research and Training Institute [16] BCBS Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk, 2011, p. 3 [17] Power p. 103 Cited by Johannes Gaus aus Böblingen, The Risks of Financial Risk Management, Master-Thesis, Economics of Financial Institutions European Business School, Department Corporate Management & Economics, Zeppelin University, p. 38 [18] Marinoiu Ana Maria, Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Operational Risk In International Business: Taxonomy And Assessment Methods, P. 196 [19] Marinoiu Ana Maria, Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of International Business and Economics, Operational Risk in International Business: Taxonomy and Assessment Methods, P. 197

by Youness El Kandoussi | 1 year ago | 0 Comment(s) | 207 Share(s) | Tags :


Abstract: Risk management is a critical aspect of any organization's success. In this comprehensive 10-page article, we delve deep into the concepts of risk management, risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity. We explore their definitions, importance, and the interplay between them. Furthermore, we discuss various strategies and best practices for effective risk mitigation in the ever-changing landscape of modern business. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The Importance of Risk Management 1.2. Defining Key Concepts2. Understanding Risk 2.1. Types of Risk 2.2. The Risk-Reward Trade-off3. Risk Management Framework 3.1. Identifying Risks 3.2. Assessing Risks 3.3. Managing Risks4. Risk Appetite 4.1. Definition and Significance 4.2. Aligning Risk Appetite with Business Objectives5. Risk Tolerance 5.1. Determining Risk Tolerance 5.2. Balancing Risk and Reward6. Risk Capacity 6.1. Assessing Risk Capacity 6.2. Setting Boundaries7. Strategies for Effective Risk Management 7.1. Diversification 7.2. Risk Transfer 7.3. Risk Avoidance 7.4. Risk Reduction 7.5. Risk Acceptance8. Case Studies 8.1. Enron Corporation 8.2. JPMorgan Chase & the London Whale 8.3. Tesla's Risk-Taking Approach9. Risk Management in the Digital Age 9.1. Cybersecurity Risks 9.2. Data Privacy Risks10. Conclusion 10.1. The Evolving Landscape of Risk Management 10.2. The Imperative of Continuous Adaptation 1. Introduction 1.1. The Importance of Risk Management Risk is an inherent part of business operations. It can manifest in various forms, from financial and operational risks to strategic and reputational risks. Effective risk management is crucial for organizations to not only survive but thrive in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. Without proper risk management strategies in place, organizations are vulnerable to unexpected setbacks and potential crises. 1.2. Defining Key Concepts Before diving into risk management strategies, it's essential to understand key concepts related to risk. These include risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity. While these terms are often used interchangeably, they each have distinct meanings and implications for an organization's risk management framework. 2. Understanding Risk 2.1. Types of Risk To effectively manage risk, one must first understand its various forms. Common types of risk include financial risk, operational risk, strategic risk, compliance risk, and reputational risk. Each of these risks poses unique challenges and requires tailored approaches to mitigation. 2.2. The Risk-Reward Trade-off Risk is not inherently negative. In fact, it is often intertwined with opportunities for growth and innovation. The concept of the risk-reward trade-off acknowledges that higher levels of risk can yield greater rewards, but they also come with increased potential for losses. Striking the right balance between risk and reward is a fundamental consideration for any organization. 3. Risk Management Framework 3.1. Identifying Risks Effective risk management begins with the identification of potential risks. This involves a comprehensive analysis of internal and external factors that could impact the organization's objectives. Risk identification is an ongoing process that requires input from all levels of the organization. 3.2. Assessing Risks Once risks are identified, they must be assessed in terms of their potential impact and likelihood. Quantitative and qualitative methods, such as risk matrices and scenario analysis, are commonly used to evaluate risks. This assessment informs the prioritization of risks for mitigation efforts. 3.3. Managing Risks Risk management involves a range of strategies to address identified risks. These strategies can include risk avoidance, risk reduction, risk transfer, risk acceptance, and diversification. The choice of strategy depends on the organization's risk appetite, tolerance, and capacity. 4. Risk Appetite 4.1. Definition and Significance Risk appetite is the level of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It is a fundamental component of an organization's risk management framework as it sets the tone for how much risk is considered acceptable. Risk appetite should align with an organization's strategic goals and values. 4.2. Aligning Risk Appetite with Business Objectives To effectively manage risk, an organization's risk appetite must align with its business objectives. For example, a tech startup seeking rapid growth may have a higher risk appetite, while a well-established financial institution may prioritize stability and have a lower risk appetite. Balancing risk appetite with risk tolerance is critical to avoid taking unnecessary risks or stifling innovation. 5. Risk Tolerance 5.1. Determining Risk Tolerance Risk tolerance is the degree of risk an organization is willing to endure before taking corrective action. It is often measured in terms of specific metrics, such as financial losses or project delays. Determining risk tolerance involves evaluating the organization's financial capacity to withstand losses and its willingness to take risks. 5.2. Balancing Risk and Reward Balancing risk tolerance with risk appetite is essential for maintaining a healthy risk management framework. An organization must strike a balance between pursuing opportunities that align with its risk appetite and ensuring that it does not exceed its risk tolerance, which could lead to catastrophic consequences. 6. Risk Capacity 6.1. Assessing Risk Capacity Risk capacity is the maximum amount of risk an organization can afford to take without jeopardizing its viability. It takes into account the organization's financial resources, capital reserves, and overall financial health. Assessing risk capacity involves evaluating the organization's ability to absorb losses without severe consequences. 6.2. Setting Boundaries Establishing clear boundaries for risk capacity is crucial for avoiding overexposure to risk. These boundaries serve as safeguards to prevent an organization from taking on more risk than it can handle. Effective risk capacity management ensures the organization's long-term sustainability. 7. Strategies for Effective Risk Management 7.1. Diversification Diversification involves spreading investments or operations across a variety of assets or markets. This strategy reduces the impact of a single risk event on the overall portfolio. Diversifying across different industries, geographic regions, or asset classes can mitigate risks associated with economic fluctuations. 7.2. Risk Transfer Risk transfer involves shifting the financial burden of a risk to another party, typically through insurance or contractual agreements. This strategy can be particularly effective for mitigating specific risks, such as liability or property damage. 7.3. Risk Avoidance Risk avoidance entails eliminating activities or investments that carry unacceptable levels of risk. While this strategy can be effective for high-impact, low-probability risks, it may also limit growth opportunities. 7.4. Risk Reduction Risk reduction involves implementing measures to decrease the likelihood or impact of a risk. This may include enhanced security protocols, process improvements, or disaster preparedness plans. 7.5. Risk Acceptance In some cases, organizations may choose to accept certain risks when the potential benefits outweigh the potential losses. Risk acceptance should be a conscious and informed decision, with contingency plans in place. 8. Case Studies 8.1. Enron Corporation The Enron Corporation scandal serves as a cautionary tale of the consequences of failing to manage financial and operational risks adequately. Enron's aggressive risk-taking and lack of transparency ultimately led to its downfall and the loss of billions of dollars for investors. 8.2. JPMorgan Chase & the London Whale The JPMorgan Chase "London Whale" incident highlights the importance of risk monitoring and control. In this case, a trader's risky bets resulted in massive losses for the bank, illustrating the need for robust risk management systems. 8.3. Tesla's Risk-Taking Approach Tesla's ambitious approach to electric vehicle innovation and market disruption showcases the potential rewards of a high-risk, high-reward strategy. Elon Musk's willingness to take substantial risks has propelled Tesla to a dominant position in the electric vehicle industry. 9. Risk Management in the Digital Age 9.1. Cybersecurity Risks The digital age has introduced new and complex risks, particularly in the realm of cybersecurity. Organizations must invest in robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive data and infrastructure from cyber threats. 9.2. Data Privacy Risks With the proliferation of data collection and storage, data privacy risks have become a significant concern. Organizations must navigate a web of regulations and consumer expectations to safeguard personal data. 10. Conclusion 10.1. The Evolving Landscape of Risk Management In conclusion, risk management is a dynamic and essential practice for organizations of all sizes and industries. Understanding the concepts of risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity is fundamental to building a resilient risk management framework. Moreover, the strategies discussed in this article provide valuable insights into mitigating risks and seizing opportunities. 10.2. The Imperative of Continuous Adaptation As the business environment continues to evolve, so too must an organization's approach to risk management. Flexibility, adaptability, and a commitment to staying informed about emerging risks are crucial for navigating the complex and ever-changing landscape of risk management. Incorporating these principles and strategies into your organization's risk management framework will enhance its ability to thrive in the face of uncertainty, ultimately ensuring a more secure and prosperous future. This article provides a comprehensive overview of risk management, risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity. It explores their definitions, significance, and practical implications for organizations. Additionally, it delves into various strategies and case studies, offering a well-rounded perspective on the complex world of risk management. References and Sources [1] COSO. (2013). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. [2] Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute. [3] International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management. International Organization for Standardization. [4] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2021). Cybersecurity framework: Version 1.1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. [5] General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Official Journal of the European Union. Specific References [1.1] "Without proper risk management strategies in place, organizations are vulnerable to unexpected setbacks and potential crises." (COSO, 2013) [2.2] "The concept of the risk-reward trade-off acknowledges that higher levels of risk can yield greater rewards, but they also come with increased potential for losses." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [3.1] "Risk identification is an ongoing process that requires input from all levels of the organization." (International Organization for Standardization, 2018) [4.1] "Risk appetite is the level of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives." (COSO, 2013) [4.2] "An organization's risk appetite must align with its business objectives." (International Organization for Standardization, 2018) [5.1] "Determining risk tolerance involves evaluating the organization's financial capacity to withstand losses and its willingness to take risks." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [5.2] "Balancing risk tolerance with risk appetite is essential for maintaining a healthy risk management framework." (COSO, 2013) [6.1] "Assessing risk capacity involves evaluating the organization's ability to absorb losses without severe consequences." (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021) [6.2] "Establishing clear boundaries for risk capacity is crucial for avoiding overexposure to risk." (International Organization for Standardization, 2018) [7.1] "Diversification reduces the impact of a single risk event on the overall portfolio." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [7.2] "Risk transfer can be particularly effective for mitigating specific risks, such as liability or property damage." (COSO, 2013) [7.3] "While risk avoidance can be effective for high-impact, low-probability risks, it may also limit growth opportunities." (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021) [7.4] "Risk reduction may include enhanced security protocols, process improvements, or disaster preparedness plans." (International Organization for Standardization, 2018) [7.5] "Risk acceptance should be a conscious and informed decision, with contingency plans in place." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [8.1] "Enron's aggressive risk-taking and lack of transparency ultimately led to its downfall and the loss of billions of dollars for investors." (COSO, 2013) [8.2] "The JPMorgan Chase 'London Whale' incident highlights the importance of risk monitoring and control." (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021) [8.3] "Elon Musk's willingness to take substantial risks has propelled Tesla to a dominant position in the electric vehicle industry." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [9.1] "Organizations must invest in robust cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive data and infrastructure from cyber threats." (General Data Protection Regulation, 2016) [9.2] "Organizations must navigate a web of regulations and consumer expectations to safeguard personal data." (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021) [10.1] "The digital age has introduced new and complex risks, particularly in the realm of cybersecurity." (Project Management Institute, 2017) [10.2] "Understanding the concepts of risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity is fundamental to building a resilient risk management framework." (COSO, 2013) Photo credits to http://www.criscexamstudy.com/

by Youness El Kandoussi | 7 months ago | 0 Comment(s) | 168 Share(s) | Tags :